[INFO] Development Journal

[Myth]

I hope this was sarcasm, otherwise...
Plz stop THAT. I hate them (at least 95 % of them, afaik Gen has done a nice one). Those generalizations are provocative.

Ok ok, I get the idea. It's not that like I don't like EVERY fot map.

Oah common.. I write my ass off everyday, and you can't get enough ^^

You have already written far more than what anyone could ask for, so let's just ignore the last post I made. Good luck finishing what you already planned. ^^

[Shadow]

JOURNAL DATE: 02.02.2010 - Software Post-Processing goes Beta !

CHANGES / UPDATES

• Combiner Support (allows to create complex Post-Processing Channels)
• Major bugs fixed (corrected Fullscreen Rendering, debugged Zone Support etc.)
• Trigger Support
• Volume/Zone Support
• Level/World controlled Support
• Script/Function controlled Support (any actor may cause Post-Processing)
• Camera controlled Support

OVERVIEWS

Nothing spectacular today, but at least worth to report about.
I finally got full script support working for current Post-Processing System (short: PPS).
You can add and control Post-Processing from now on by the following types:

• Zone and Volume controlled, each Region has it's own unique set of Post-Process Effects.
• Trigger/Event controlled, triggering/untriggering sdkPostProcessEvent.uc renders an associated Post-Process Effect
• Level/World controlled, a major Post-Processing Effect that stays with the map
• Script/Function based, simply call the function "SCRegisterPostProcessing()" on the new player classes
• For the UnrealCine Movie System, editing a Camera Actor you can add Post-Processing on this too

MEDIA




Gonna start with the Hardware Post-Processing tomorrow...

[Creavion]

Yes.. the left picture, thats the effect I was talking about. Only difference it was red and has some kind of wet texture. (ok you also had only mono sound)

[Shadow]

Yes.. the left picture, thats the effect I was talking about. Only difference it was red and has some kind of wet texture. (ok you also had only mono sound)

what ? when did you talk about it ? huh ?

[Creavion]

Some days ago, icq, L4D2 ?

[Shadow]

Ah ! Now I remember.. ^^

[papercoffee]

Ah ! Now I remember.. ^^

You mean you have read the older post.

BTW. Great stuff ...I don't know if I can handle this.
I am a rudimental mapper but some maps are experimental (They're realy ill)
I build a ski-slope map where you ski down the mountain and go through portals. You have the feeling of an endless ride.

Ok I need this SDK!

[Shadow]

Ah ! Now I remember.. ^^

You mean you have read the older post.

BTW. Great stuff ...I don't know if I can handle this.
I am a rudimental mapper but some maps are experimental (They're realy ill)
I build a ski-slope map where you ski down the mountain and go through portals. You have the feeling of an endless ride.

Ok I need this SDK!

You will handle this, believe me. Liek for the beam emitters for example: You add one of these to the map, assign a texture... a beam will be drawn. It's really that simple. For the Emitters I'm also creating a realtime-editing menu / map where you can copy and paste the edited presets into your emitter's defaultproperties


NEW SHOTS:

[Creavion]

Can this thingies also be moved over a attachmover like in this generator in unreal 2 (first planet: sancatuary/Elara V)?

BTW: Looks good of course^^

[Shadow]

Yes of course: Triggering, moving, attaching, EVERYTHING
Wouldn't code emitters without these functions.

[Saya-chan]

Yay tesla! This will surely come in handy for some of my stuff.

[editor Dave]

Can I change the colour how I want it to be? If yes, than I would use this effect in my next map. Nothing could fit better than this. Thank you

[Shadow]

Dynamic Color isn't yet supported for Beam Emitters, but I plan to implement it..

[[did]Madis]

Shadow, you make me moist.

[papercoffee]

Shadow, you make me moist.

....this picture... in my mind ...go away ...nooooooooo