CTF-XV-HaLfpiPe~

[Buggie]

Convert from UT2004 for CTF with X-Vehicles this map:
VCTF-HaLfpiPe

Shot00005.jpg

Shot00006.jpg

Shot00007.jpg

Shot00008.jpg

Shot00009.jpg

Shot00010.jpg

This map need XVehicles at least v41 for load:
viewtopic.php?f=34&t=14936

CTF-XV-HaLfpiPe~v2.7z

[EvilGrins]

Players have the advantage over vehicles on this map, as the driving areas are somewhat hampered.

That big area across the middle is too high up for jeeps to get to, except for the jeeps already up there.

Flag captures primarily by players not in jeeps, as running across the distance is easiest and players can go where jeeps can't.

[Buggie]

v1

- Correct few mistakes in paths.

Updated at first post: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15092

[Buggie]

Gameplay on map:

[Buggie]

v2

- Added Manta.
- Small improvements.
- Now this map need XVehicles at least v41 for load!

Updated in first post: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=15092

scr_1658119567.png

scr_1658119604.png

[sektor2111]

Observation.

v1

- Correct few mistakes in paths.

Not yet...

Code: Select all

V2
DevPath: 1000 navigation nodes searched from FlagBase7!
PathsDebug: Scout unable to find path from FlagBase6 to FlagBase7.
Log: Aligned camera on the current target.
DevPath: 1000 navigation nodes searched from FlagBase7!
PathsDebug: Scout unable to find path from PlayerStart0 to FlagBase7.

I'm not extremely interested about such CTF stage or else here I would redo entire navigation.
Something for those wondering how these can be improved - let's look at something...

NiceOptions.PNG

We not only already have an Inventory around but also a PathNode that can be removed as long as Nodes on left and right will connect normally under stock range without issues. Here map can have less than 800 Nodes and overloaded message will cease to exists. But here stage is aiming only 469.

[Buggie]

I not really care about people who prefer use v436. it is their problem, not my.
On v469b+ all fine.

[sektor2111]

Good to know, and you SHOULD EXPLAIN in ReadMe that map is aiming ONLY 469 without misleading 436 users about a CTF Map.

[Buggie]

Ok. I will consider it.

And you are wrong. PathNode on picture is important, not placed "just because" and can not be dropped without some bad consequences.
But since you:

I'm not extremely interested about such CTF stage or else here I would redo entire navigation.

I prefer not waste my time with explain why.

Also it is very strange if you "not extremely interested" why you still appear in such topics and continue post in it posts.
But anyway, this not really matter, why. Not interested - please, skip such topics silently.
I "not extremely interested about" opinion of people with such relation to subject.

[sektor2111]

Also it is very strange if you "not extremely interested" why you still appear in such topics and continue post in it posts.

Not really. I do random checks for figuring when you'll be able to setup some navigation optimizations if in old discussions optimization was a subject.
It would be some more interest if these would be for everyone, not only for 469 and... amazingly I see what nodes have you done there, some of them are pointless, routing pawn even if cost is high because there are alternate options in the same place with low cost. They only prevent them from ledges which is easy doable by not adding nodes where Pawn should not go. You can keep in mind that I worked at such devs a lot of time and I "can see" 90% what will happen during game - pathing to me is easy, nothing like Rocket Science.
But... never mind. Good luck in advance !