DM-Underland-UT4

[Aspide]

Light me with what glitch...
I don't see any changes in the code of original swJumpPad - it was just imported in MyLevel.

The first version of the map had a problem where if you try to see the code of swjumppad you will either see a glitch mess (like in 469e) or have the editor crash (like in 436), this was probably caused by the fact that the map used to have more MyLevel decorations (and therefore scripts) but because of performance issues they were removed, but I failed to check the MyLevel code before releasing the map

..... And yeah, those actors are indeed out of bounds

[sektor2111]

Reminder: swJumpPad doesn't include known crusher bugs, it only has flawed default properties - that's to be clear. The code it's identical with code from package - What was fixed then ? - I must ask. By extracting the two scripts into two separate TXT files and comparing them there is no difference, they are the same until last byte. To mention that map works in the same way with 1073 ReachSpecs instead of 7086 - including those concerning swJumpPads.
The rest of supposed corruptions probably are coming from some "names" used... I don't have any clue what sort of classes of "brush" are used there, I have never seen such names...

[Aspide]

Reminder: swJumpPad doesn't include known crusher bugs, it only has flawed default properties - that's to be clear. The code it's identical with code from package - What was fixed then ? - I must ask. By extracting the two scripts into two separate TXT files and comparing them there is no difference, they are the same until last byte. To mention that map works in the same way with 1073 ReachSpecs instead of 7086 - including those concerning swJumpPads.

open the first version of Underland in the 469e editor and type "Edit Script" when selecting swjumppad, you will see this

Shot001.png

if you try the same thing in 436, the editor crashes.

This is the issue that was fixed with the swjumppad code, the actor still works but it breaks in the editor, now in version 1.1 that doesn't happen.

[sektor2111]

Interesting stuff but... I can read the code and I even could copy it. That issue is coming probably from elsewhere affecting scripting window, something might not be an UT related class in that variant...
Years go I did some "protected class" which was having nasty reaction if somebody would check the code... perhaps it was generated something similar as effect of whatever object used.

[Barbie]

That garbish line reminds me to bug 1863...

[Skerion]

I realize this is a pretty late response, but I'm wondering if you'd be alright with people making changes to this map, specifically replacing what looks like an AI generated sky texture used for the skybox with something more properly made. It doesn't stylistically fit in well with the rest of the map and honestly it's kind of a big blemish on an otherwise very well made map due to current ethical issues with generative AI.

I remember that at least one other map you made (DM-Akbal) also had an AI generated sky texture, so I'm wondering if we'd be allowed to make changes to that map's skybox too.

[Red_Fist]

I wish with maps like this people could say if it's a stock map or not.

So i downloaded all the community maps packs, and it wasn't in there either.
Then I found the one map, but "Kaka" didn't put the title in, so it didn't show up in the game map list, LoL

Seems like a tough map to remake for UT

But since it's been a long time, I can't remember some map, and then it's like everyone knows the map,,,,or do they.?
so it would be nice to know if it wasn't a stock UT2004 map or if it came in some map pack,to lesson the confusion. I finally played the original through the editor.

So now I have to check yours out.