48 hours speed mapping contest = VOTING!!

[Raynor]

The missing pack is from the official 4th patch for UT.

Anyway ...the 48-SC-Map-pack will include the fixed versions + all necessary packages.

UTtech4.utx is not an official texture package and wasn't included with any official patches or bonus packs.
You are mixing it up with SGTech1.utx which is part of BP4. UTtech4.utx itself was included with Tactical Ops mod.

[GenMoKai]

Fun fact:
did you know that you can score a lot of frag on GlaciamOtium by killing the glowing flying sprites? (explosions do trick!) Also, i liked this one the most.
(RedDust looks nice on the screenshots, too bad i could not play with due to missing package.)
(Reverie needs to be finished. Then it may become a decent map)

Rofl... didnt knew that but im glad you liked the map

[papercoffee]

You are mixing it up with SGTech1.utx which is part of BP4. UTtech4.utx itself was included with Tactical Ops mod.

Oh... yeas could be. But I hadn't installed TO on this UT-version. Where did I get this texture pack? (and no, I didn't get it from cache, 'cause I delete it at regular intervals)

[TheDane]

But I hadn't installed TO on this UT-version. Where did I get this texture pack? (and no, I didn't get it from cache, 'cause I delete it at regular intervals)

Quite a lot of maps uses this texture pack, so you've proberly just pickup it up that way?

[papercoffee]

But I hadn't installed TO on this UT-version. Where did I get this texture pack? (and no, I didn't get it from cache, 'cause I delete it at regular intervals)

Quite a lot of maps uses this texture pack, so you've proberly just pickup it up that way?

Ok with a umod installation maybe.

[Dr.Flay]

I just looked in my TacOps folder, and the original is dated 09/12/1999
It has been around for so long and used without credits so often, people assume it is an Epic file.

Here is a fine example of why credits are important, even when permission is not available.

[Feralidragon]

I just looked in my TacOps folder, and the original is dated 09/12/1999
It has been around for so long and used without credits so often, people assume it is an Epic file.

Here is a fine example of why credits are important, even when permission is not available.

But that's exclusively TacOps fault though. They knew very well how Epic named their UTTech files, and decided to follow the same naming to appear official. What if Epic released another bonus pack with their own UTTech4 then? Why didn't TacOps named it TOTech for example?
In this specific case, using the file without credits (or crediting Epic instead) doesn't seem that bad though, the TacOps team should have their own nomenclature (just like any mod or custom pack) instead of trying to literally make their files look like the official thing on purpose.

[>@tack!<]

I really like Reverie, although I would rather play DM on it than DOM

[papercoffee]

Ok, to all participants !!!

Please send my via PM the absolutely most final map with all missing packages. I'll wrap this up now.

[DeathoX 8]

I really like Reverie, although I would rather play DM on it than DOM

Thanks, glad you liked it. I made a DM version after the contest end, it's going to be included in the final map pack.


@papercoffee
PM sent.

[Radi]

Again, thanks to Ferali for CSMCX package thanks much ! .. wow, these directional coronas, emitters are simply great ah I have orgasm! Thanks for these
I was looking for something like this last time thanks for sharing this great work Im going to use these effects in my still incomplete map I wrote 'thank you' already ? :p

[Feralidragon]

No problem. I wanted to add some custom coronas and emitters to my map, and I ended up doing a full package of them for public usage, I'm glad that despite the map being a failure, the package is useful to someone.