UT99 Server Query

External tools, software and sites for creating or editing UT99 resources.
User avatar
rjmno1
Masterful
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:38 pm
Personal rank: masterfull
Location: https://sites.google.com/view/unrealtou ... oject/home
Contact:

Re: UT99 Server Query

Post by rjmno1 »

earthangel was mine name i,m on the list. :tu:
unreal tournament 99
®
Image
Image
ImageImage
https://sites.google.com/view/unrealtou ... oject/home mine home ut99 website.
https://richardmoust105.blogspot.com/20 ... ef-in.html dutch blog page about ut99 settings.
User avatar
papercoffee
Godlike
Posts: 10443
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:36 am
Personal rank: coffee addicted !!!
Location: Cologne, the city with the big cathedral.
Contact:

Re: UT99 Server Query

Post by papercoffee »

@rjmno1
Please stop to unearth old threads ...especially if your post has nothing to do with the former discussion.
User avatar
Dr.Flay
Godlike
Posts: 3347
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:26 pm
Personal rank: Chaos Evangelist
Location: Kernow, UK
Contact:

Re: UT99 Server Query

Post by Dr.Flay »

@Papercoffee actually the thread was resurrected the day before by 3anon with an updated version :tongue:
Thankyou for your work @3anon and don't forget that you can use the http://333networks.com/json API if you want

OK. file report does not look good !
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/27f ... /detection
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/31f ... /detection
It doesn't seem to do anything weird from looking at the sandbox reports, so I do suspect a false positive due to it being new and something that fetches data when you run it.

It is notable that only the 1 Epic masterserver is being queried.
I recommend using the 333networks masterserver do you can see more results.
User avatar
papercoffee
Godlike
Posts: 10443
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:36 am
Personal rank: coffee addicted !!!
Location: Cologne, the city with the big cathedral.
Contact:

Re: UT99 Server Query

Post by papercoffee »

Dr.Flay wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:50 am @Papercoffee actually the thread was resurrected the day before by 3anon with an updated version :tongue:
Oh ...you are right.
:facepalm:
Post Reply