Umake v1.2.X

[Buggie]

Little fix for Umake v1.2:

1. Multimonitor fix from here: viewtopic.php?f=58&t=13028
2. Added "Rebuild" button for call build process again.

Spoiler

I use Resource Hacker 5.1.7 for add:

Code: Select all

  object ButtonRebuild: TButton
    Left = 120
    Top = 53
    Width = 57
    Height = 25
    Anchors = [akTop, akRight]
    BiDiMode = bdLeftToRight
    Caption = '&Rebuild'
    Enabled = True
    ParentBiDiMode = False
    TabOrder = 5
    OnClick = FormShow
  end

Unfortunately attempt fix label with version break app. So it still labeled as 1.1 in About tab.

So now you can open script in editor, fix errors, switch back to umake and simple press "Rebuild".
Repeat until all compile error not eliminated.

scr_1595629006.png

Source: https://github.com/SeriousBuggie/unreal-umake

UMake-1-2-3.zip

Spoiler

Caveats:
1. Do not use checkbox 'Always display details during compilation' or dialog will expand height on every "Rebuild" attempt.
2. If finally no errors happens, then errors block still same. So you need read label above progress bar.
3. Progress bar not work as intended for any rebuild.
4. Maybe something else.

UMake-1-2-1.zip

[Chamberly]

3 and 4 - is it holding the old data reference and not using the new changes?

[Buggie]

Progress bar stuck at end.
Error messages updates if error changed. But not disappear if current build without errors.
Better try yourself.

[x21]

I was able to change the version to 1.2. I would suggest making the fixed version 1.3 as it's possible to do.

Umake 1.2.png

EDIT: I'll just make the change. Edit2: It appears there's only room to edit 11 characters in that field.

Umake 1.3.png

---

Automatically merged

I was just thinking about the possibility of abbreviating "Version 0.0" as "Ver. 0.0.00". This would give a lot more flexibility for different version numbers.

[Barbie]

I was just thinking about the possibility of abbreviating "Version 0.0" as "Ver. 0.0.00". This would give a lot more flexibility for different version numbers.

Maybe take into account the usage described in Wikipedia (sadly no English version available - notify me if I should translate).

[Buggie]

Not need translate. Visit: https://semver.org/

[x21]

I was just thinking about the possibility of abbreviating "Version 0.0" as "Ver. 0.0.00". This would give a lot more flexibility for different version numbers.

Maybe take into account the usage described in Wikipedia (sadly no English version available - notify me if I should translate).

It should be quite possible to do that if we omit the build number and abbreviate the word Version to Ver. This allows us to have versions such as "Ver. 1.10.1". Attempting to add anything more to the current data shifts all the references in the binary.

---

Automatically merged

It is possible to change all the highlighted bytes without causing the program to break.

Umake1.PNG

This gives us the ability to add another digit later on.

Umake2.PNG

---

Automatically merged

Not need translate. Visit: https://semver.org/

Based upon that link I still believe 1.3 works better as you did add a feature.

[Buggie]

v1.2.2

* Improve "Rebuild" button.
* Auto say "Yes" to all compatibility questions, instead of stuck build.
* Update version number
* Sources at: https://github.com/SeriousBuggie/unreal-umake

Update in first post: viewtopic.php?f=58&t=14044

[Barbie]

What compiler did you use? Lazarus? Delphi?

[Buggie]

Borland Delphi 7. Something wrong?

[Eternity]

With FPC no way to get such a modest file size, i guess... But we could have a build for Linux that way.

[Buggie]

Feel free adapt sources then.

There used OLE. And dcu from Delphi2 for this. So I think it not be super easy.

[b1t5murf]

Borland Delphi 7. Something wrong?

Hello Buggie,

Long time UT player and active modern Delphi developer, new forum member here.

As I'm working on fixing some bugs and updating UMake to compile with the latest Delphi versions (Full unicode support, HighDPI improvements, modern language features etc) for DNF,
I don't want to t-bone the effort already done here, but I wanted to ask if there are outstanding issues with UMake which needs to be fixed while I'm at it working with the code?
More so there's a coordinated effort to keep the tool up to date?
I saw mentions of a wish for a Linux version as well?

Kind regards
b1t5murf

[Buggie]

No issues on which I aware of.

AFAIK it is already up-to-date. You can make PR to github repo if want.

Yes, some users ask for Linux version.

[b1t5murf]

No issues on which I aware of.

AFAIK it is already up-to-date. You can make PR to github repo if want.

Yes, some users ask for Linux version.

Okay, no worries!

Right out of the box, the code isn't able to compile with the latest Delphi 11 release (Sept 7, 2022) and needs a bit of TLC.

I'll open a PR once the code has been updated