Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Discussions about everything else
User avatar
papercoffee
Godlike
Posts: 10700
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:36 am
Personal rank: coffee addicted !!!
Location: Cologne, the city with the big cathedral.

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by papercoffee »

@wallabra Then write a request in Suggestions, Criticism, Feedback
And we can discuss the necessity of such a section.

Right now this thread belongs in off-topic.
Which doesn't mean that this project isn't interesting.
Image
Red_Fist
Godlike
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by Red_Fist »

Before,,,everyone chimed in.
My main observation is ,, adding links to github, AND READING.

I don't read github to understand it, I do know a little code.
So for me I STILL, don't know what it makes, changes, does, or works, to know what the project is trying to accomplish.,.,., as opposed to posting links to github.

Like what is it :|
Binary Space Partitioning
User avatar
SilverSound
Adept
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:12 am
Personal rank: Curious
Location: St. Cloud, Florida

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by SilverSound »

I don't see the need. There would be one section for one thread for one project. Maybe if the original unreal engines go open source, we could see a section for that like doom. there isn't a reason to right now.
"Woah what?! I wish I was recording that...."
User avatar
wallabra
Godlike
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 7:08 pm
Personal rank: Resident Wallaby
Discord: wallabra
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by wallabra »

SilverSound wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 7:22 pm Maybe if the original unreal engines go open source, we could see a section for that like doom. there isn't a reason to right now.
I'm not holding my breath for Epic to open source the engine. Tim Sweeney's kind of... bleh. Why should we wait on them when we can reverse engineer the engine? What is the practical diference? Because, like I said earlier, it's not illegal or anything.
boing boing
User avatar
OjitroC
Godlike
Posts: 3802
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 8:46 pm

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by OjitroC »

Isn’t reverse engineering specifically prohibited by the EULA for UT99 v436?

Doesn’t Unreal Engine1 contain ‘components' used under licence by Epic which would thus require the grant of a licence by their developers for use in any other context? (This is implied by the devs of SE in their reply to an issue raised on GitHub).
User avatar
TigerTheGreat
Adept
Posts: 423
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:00 pm
Personal rank: UMS R&D CEO

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by TigerTheGreat »

Reverse-engineering is prohibited by pretty much EVERY game's EULA for at least two decades now. At LEAST.
Image
I am the Unreal archivist and historian. If you have something from the past of Unreal that I don't have, do tell.
~formerly Delacroix
gargul2
Average
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:16 am

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by gargul2 »

SilverSound wrote: Fri May 02, 2025 10:10 pm You got that part wrong and is probably what has caused you confusion. It's a re-implementation of Unreal Engine NOT UT99.
I did not, and I do know what the project is about, maybe I used too broad wordings on my side in my comment, most likely due to context of whole discussion regarding a realationship of the project to UT99 game as a whole, hence I reffered to it as a whole, and used wording that refers to the whole, hence dropped "engine" part, but I knew it's about an engine only.
SilverSound wrote: Fri May 02, 2025 10:10 pmIt's just not related to UT99 directly.
Which means by a logical deduction, that it's related at least indirectly (or partially, call it what you like), at least some progress here compared to what was heavily and aggressively accented / claimed at the beginning of the thread by some users who wrote that it's unrelated "at all".
User avatar
Metallicafan212
Novice
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2025 9:21 pm
Personal rank: OldUnreal Developer

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by Metallicafan212 »

I have no clue what you're trying to get at here man, it's off-topic because we at OldUnreal are currently officially supporting UT with patches and the ability to get a legal copy of the game for free. The community is thriving, active, and supported.

Surreal engine is just a reverse engineering platform with the goal to eventually run all UE1 games, but not MOD them. That is out of scope. It isn't the normal game, nor will it ever will be. Their plan is just to run the base games for each game, not enhance them. The OldUnreal 469 patch (and eventual 470 patch) are currently enhancing UT99. The OldUnreal patch is the OFFICIAL patch for the game, as we have agreements in place with Epic to do so, and agreements in place to also distribute the game for free, with the patch in our installer. Surreal engine is off topic because it isn't official, that's the short.

@papercoffee Might want to just lock this thread, it's going nowhere and I think it's just going to continue to drive drama.
User avatar
UnrealGGecko
Godlike
Posts: 3067
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:26 am
Personal rank: lizard lizard lizard
Discord: UnrealGGecko
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]

Post by UnrealGGecko »

Agreed.

-=Locked=-