A reply to "Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]"

Discussions about everything else
gargul2
Average
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:16 am

A reply to "Surreal Engine - [Unreal Tournament (UT99) Engine Reimplementation]"

Post by gargul2 »

This is just a reply to a comment from the previous thread: viewtopic.php?p=151470#p151470 because the previous thread was overzealously and prematurely locked, due to Metallicafan212 and papercoffee misinterpreting my last comment and unnecessarily creating their own virtual world and drama. Also it's unfair to have taken out a possibility to reply and defend against someone else's erroneous accusations, and given the accusations were made in public, the reply should be in public as well:
Metallicafan212 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmI have no clue what you're trying to get at here man
Nothing more, than to just emphasize what half of the commenters here have already agreed - that the project was not unrelated "at all" to UT99.
Metallicafan212 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmSurreal engine is (...)
I do know exactly what it is, therefore no need to lecture me about it, but regardless of what it is, it's not unrelated "at all" to UT99.
Metallicafan212 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pm, it's off-topic
Metallicafan212 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmSurreal engine is off topic
I didn't say anything about "off-topic" in my last comment, just that it's not unrelated "at all" to UT99. The both terms are not necessarily related to each other, which you apparently don't get, you're confusing things here, and you've completely misread context of my comment.
Metallicafan212 wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmMight want to just lock this thread, it's going nowhere and I think it's just going to continue to drive drama.
You've apparently assumed wrongly the context of my last comment, you added your own wrong context to it, and projected with it, creating your own virtual world and "drama". Just becasue I said that it's not unrelated "at all", doesn't mean I still fight with a fact that it belongs to "off-topic" subforum - I already accepted it in the middle of the thread, and I'm fine with it, hence I don't know what is your both's problem and "drama" about.

And if you (both) "don't have a clue what I was trying to get at here" maybe all you had to do ask or/and was wait for my reply instead of overzealously and prematurely judging and closing a thread?
papercoffee wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmAnd it isn't like this thread is now trashed, it's still open and everyone can add their 2 cents.
SilverSound wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmNo one is saying you can't talk about it.
Sure, as we can see right now. In any case, not anymore.
papercoffee wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:33 pmRight now this thread belongs in off-topic.
Which doesn't mean that this project isn't interesting.
And I'm fine with that it belongs in off-topic, what Metallicafan212 and you fail to understand.

Anyway, I don't care anymore whether you will unlock the previous thread or not, after your wrong interpretation of my last comment. As for this new thread, its intention was just to reply and defend, to what everyone has a right, and not to create another dicussion/thread, so you can lock it, and if you don't want me to create another threads, then just lock it without throwing another accusation at me (unless you provide me a possibility to reply).

---
Metalfist:
Locked thread = locked thread