Since I only started it today, it's unlikely that I will able to submit it on the deadline, but you could at least expect it in the final pack.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
The map thread is this one: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13070
I'd offer to give you some Lemsip but that doesn't stop the dizzinesspapercoffee wrote:Sorry guys ...I'm out ...
I thought I can pull this off in the last two weeks. First unforeseen events happened and then I got some kind of super flue. I'm sitting here vertiginous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_traditionSwanky wrote:We've had those ever since the very first FoTs and even before those.
I'm not saying to ignore them, I just think it's not fair to post paragraphs of problems that fall outside the scope of some of these entries. Take warp zones for instance since they are popular this year. Does it really need reminding that some weapons won't work through them and that's valid criticism? Some entries have warp zones and we all know the limits and pitfalls of using them. I only suggest that the feedback focus on things that mappers can alter, otherwise to do it your way eliminates using warp zones at all since they carry along the problems and automatic negative feedback.Swanky wrote: You choose to work with, around or fixing those things. It's always the mapper's choice, of course, and if people actually have concerns about it I don't see why it shouldn't happen in the specific map topic since it's actually affecting the map.